Which is better

[paularm]

Which website do you think looks better, and would you be more likely to trust?

1: http://attempt.bigsix.x10hosting.com/
2: http://cricketshop.bigsix.x10hosting.com/
3: http://etailer.bigsix.x10hosting.com/

There all have roughly the same content.

[farscapeone]

This one http://www.tutorial9.net/photoshop/c...-in-photoshop/

[xvalnar]

i think 3 looks most trustable

[somegood]

This one (http://attempt.bigsix.x10hosting.com/#) looks the coolest even do the photoshoping of the cricket player is a little skecthy. I'd trust more the last one it looks a little bi mor professional. http://etailer.bigsix.x10hosting.com/#

[misson]

"etailer" looks the most trustworthy to me as well, but it also looks a little canned (it's too much uninspired "web 2.0" styling). It also has the least wasted space and a search box. The "Solitaire Cricket" banner looks a little out of place due to the choice of font and floral pattern.

"attempt" I find the most aesthetically pleasing overall, except the space part of the image looks out of place. The vapors surrounding the player work well with the cloud-like image above it. "attempt" also looks a little sparse in terms of content; a "products" list above the striker might fill the void.

[adlands]

I like the third website you listed. It seems easier to read ie, when you look at it your eyes just naturally flow from the header to the copy explaining who you are. Then the left where the links are lead you to where you may want to go next.

Just my opinion.

[agroup]

i think 3rd one is the best for the buisness
because it has clear outlook, and looks a professional and trustable site

[mac173]

I liked cricketshop best.

[techline]

I think second one is better for search engines

[lennyboy]

I like the looks of the first site followed by the second.