apart from things in that article I have read others with people complaining about the machines overheating a lot
apart from things in that article I have read others with people complaining about the machines overheating a lot
Having grown up on Unix systems, I was really happy a few years ago when I had to port a big complex end-user app written in C++ from Windows to Mac, and discovered that the (then new) Max OsX was a Unix derivative (just like Linux). Because I'd built the app using Model-View-Controller, I only had to rewrite about 10% of the code and I got to use all the nice GNU tools instead of MicroSoft's VC++.
But something I've noticed is: when there's a bug in the code that's common to both platforms -- which account for 90% of the app -- I always wind up debugging on the Windows platform. The GUI in VC++ is REALLY nice: try debugging the same code under GNU and VC++ and you'll see what I mean. I hate to say it, because I basically loathe Windows, but the debugging part of its IDE really rocks compared to GNU.
get a Mac there so shine...then when you get a bored about 1 week later, you will for get about that "They have more viruses too" comment. Macs are good if your going to be strictly designing and reading email. At my Old designing Job I had a Mac wit a PC right next to it. Play my WinAmp Down load my Music Mess with crappy Freeware learn IP and Networking stuff bla bla bla. But hey Its your money -=)
Macs are the best because of a couple of their operating system is something very very unique about.
1. When I talk about uniqueness of the operating system it means how their product life of each operating system works. Example of it is their evolution and revolution.... this is very unique and tells a large number of stories when virus first happened in Macs, will not be run a revolution version of Macs Operating system this is because they cut away their legacy of their Old OS X code from the previous version hence making it very difficult for virus creator to create a new virus for it hence they give up... that's why there is not many virus can attack or penetrate into Macs computer unless they run a dual boot which has windows os.... only the windows os will have the virus...
2. Because of this evolution and revolution it makes software for Macs very very expensive, the amount of application and software is very limited hence another issues is boredom after long usage of macs.... hence many people will do a dual boot setting so that they can have windows xp or windows vista into their system....
3. Macs are the best for their video and gaming rendering , video editing capabilities, which has been spread so much that most of the animation movies you see are mostly made from Macs computers... They are the Video/Animator Editior Best friend.
There are several others to talk about but these three really amazed me alot.
Gaming? Macs don't do gaming without a windows OS...
I find it funny how Apple can get away with what people hated Microsoft for doing: removing reverse compatibility. Microsoft does it, and people complain about having to upgrade. Apple does it, and people praise them for a good decision.
I solemnly swear that my website reviews will be more thoughtful than five words and an ambiguous rating out of 10 or 5.
If you find this review (or post of some other sort) truly helpful, please click the little blue box in the corner of this post.
http://www.asterismstudios.com
@stealth_thunder
Dude are you pulling this stuff up out the air? No one writes Mac viruses not cause there hard to make but cause no one cares too. Why write a Virus for 10% of the worlds computers? Its as simple as that. No one duel boots OSX and Windows(yea you can but its pointless)that's why there is not many virus can attack or penetrate into Macs computer unless they run a dual boot which has windows os.... only the windows os will have the virus...
No there software is not expensive there hardware is, most of there product cost is under 60% of retail. iPods are the biggest rip off ever $90 to build the $200 Nano. Mac Hardware cost so much cause they can do that. Readhere:http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/y...ut-90-to-make/Because of this evolution and revolution it makes software for Macs very very expensive, the amount of application and software is very limited hence another issues is boredom after long usage of macs
Game rendering? Very wrong, I'm not even going to go there. "video editing capabilities" Yea Macs are good at that. But the movie studios use Linux Specs here:Macs are the best for their video and gaming rendering , video editing capabilities, which has been spread so much that most of the animation movies you see are mostly made from Macs computers
http://www.linuxmovies.org/
"Most of the major studios use Linux -- such as DreamWorks and Pixar"
Pixar's Specs:
more than 1,500 Linux desktops and 3,500 Linux servers
Desktop Hardware
HP xw8200's
dual 3.4 GHz Intel Nocona CPUs
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400/4400/4500
RenderFarm Hardware
dual 3.4 GHz Intel Nocona CPU's
Operating System
Fedora Core 2
Yes thats Right Pixar uses HP computers!
Now Linux fanboys cause Pixar uses Linux dont mean its the best for home users. I <3 Linux just not on my desktop -=)
Please do some fact checking before posting!
Linux, and even BSDs do some level of gaming. Some commercial games and almost all open source are available on all operating systems.
About video rendering: I don't see how Macs are superior any more. Sure, when they were affordable PowerPC machines they would have probably been superior. Now, they just have generic x86 hardware that can be obtained much cheaper.
For desktops and servers I will use linux. I could see Macs being viable as laptops. They have all of the drivers for the exotic laptop hardware on a good Unix-like OS, which is normally something you can only get with Windows. When using Linux on a laptop, you may be screwed for some drivers.
I've got to agree with you there... I fail to understand how macs can be considered better for graphics editing, rendering, etc... Most of the same software is available for both platforms, and now the hardware is the same as well. Blender runs about the same on both, although the excessively animated OSX desktop seems to slow things down a bit.
----------
If you found my post helpful in some way, I'd really appreciate a few credits as I'm saving up for a domain.
You can click the blue check mark in the upper right corner of this post to increase my reputation.